Towards a more complex intelligence

What if more complex intelligence is NOT returning to the unity, or being stuck in duality, but analyzing information in a non-polarized way, which is not non-duality (just another name for unity), but something more akin to triality. This would be like maintaining constant awareness of three-things-in-play, three-forces, three-tendencies at once.

Perhaps there is a 4th circuit beginning to function in man. Above the ordinary intellect (yellow), which is itself above the ordinary limbic emotions (blue), which is certainly above the ordinary lizard-brain sitting atop the spinal cord (red).

The 4th circuit is conscious nonpolarized analysis of, "what" is occurring. The 3rd circuit is the unconscious polarized thinking about, "what you're doing". The 2nd and 1st circuits are the polarized feelings and sensations about it, reflected personally, locally - to be layed down in memory. (Notice you CAN remember - if you try hard - nearly every step and activity in a day. But note, you can NOT remember what you were thinking during that same day.)

*********

Perhaps conscious evolution requires moving energy up the circuitry, in particular ways, for no other reason than to do it, to move it, because movement is Life, stagnation is Death. One must always be on guard for moments when "you" will try to steal the little-bit currently available, and use it to support a well-maintained status-quo, which is just a part of the personality wanting to stay alive at all costs, by feeding its' memory, sense-making, and story-building activities. To move the energy past the point where personality will try to steal it, sometimes requires, subterfuge, sleight-of-hand, and mis-direction - to keep the creature occupied long enough for the energy to move past it's long arms that would try to steal it.

Success in this, does not produce stories for the diary, personal anecdotes to record in memory. Stories, which pass for "work efforts", are just stories - but to suggest they're more than that and believe it, is just silly. Work efforts which don't try to pass for anything, may be, but only the one who suppressed the desire/need to squeal will ever know.

*********

In order to think in a nonlocal place in the intellect, from a more complex intelligence (which is just another way to say, think MORE than you CAN about it), you must consider the subject in a special way - non-dually, in a non-polarized way. You do not have to rule anything in or out, to consider it from a nonlocal place in the intellect. The local place in the intellect, "me", can only think about everything "from its' point-of-view", and all it has to "bring-to-the-table" are memories, of a human life spent reading and talking and moving around. Such a subject can be held in the attention, just out of reach of "me", while intentionally not forgetting it's there. The subject itself, will, if the exercise is done just right (or even sometimes, just wrong) gain mass, grow if you will, and become like a lens, focussing the available energy on the burgeoning point-of-understanding developing there. A little fire ensues and suddenly (when conditions are right) - a bonfire of burning forms.

But you always have to keep "me's" hands off it, or it immediately disperses, and simply goes to feed the local point-of-view, you were attempting to escape from.

Like into the production of "stories" - these stories and personal anecdotes, as innocuous as they are - serve two purposes, at least. The first, shared by all, is to bolster the belief that humans ARE something, KNOW something (when in fact, they ARE NOT anything yet, and they KNOW NOTHING yet), and the second, they keep the full-view, which is not hidden at all, quite hidden for all - it becomes part of the common concensus reality, the world dream.

For example: "conscious wish". This is an old idea, it goes back centuries and takes many forms. But in all the cases of reported "success", where's the proof? Can it be taught to others? Can it be proved they learned it? (Or like all such "goofy-actions-at-a-distance", is the "failure to teach/learn", simply rationalized as the students' inadequacies, rather than the, more correct, teachers' ignorance?)

It's like UFO reports - where's the proof of hard-edged scientific evidence?

It's a 1/3 or 2/3 view of a reality all are in touch with, but don't fully comprehend, and so it gets "reported" as Alien encounters, conscious-wishes-come-true, co-incidences, sychronicities, serendipities - all fun words at coctail parties, but further evidence that the one using them (believing in them) sees only 1/3 or 2/3 of something more real than they CAN imagine, and so they must step down the potency of that hardly-even-felt sensation/feeling into a buzzword-of-choice.

These are all simply cases of the energy, surging, surging, surging up the spine into the ends-of-the-nervous-system, getting inadvertantly diverted into the 3rd circuit - the explaining circuit, the story-telling circuit - and missing yet another opportunity to scale the walls of commonality, into the 4th circuit, to actually SEE 3/3 of something as it happens.

The energy wants to take form, it wants to "Be Something!" - and who can blame it, so do you! But, look not to the world for any help on this - books can't push you into a nonlocal view of yourself, only to a more firmly-held belief in the local view of yourself.

As a fellow explorer once suggested to me: "A man can read all he wants in a book about 'Embrace watchfullness, despise thoughtlessness,' or 'The named way is not the eternal way,' but it is impossible for him to ever get that thing to move beyond merely an 'opinion he holds.' Though, he actually believes HE DOES get it passed being just an opinion, when in reality such stated observations have already died and become merely opinions, and part of his thought-to-be 'self', forever: the very thing he actually thought he was struggling against. A man will never write in a book 'you must think such and such, but of course if you actually do believe what I just said you're no better than when you started.' It somehow must be discovered by a man who actually dives in and lives this."

Think about all these matters from a non-local, non-personal viewpoint, without reference to 3rd-circuit "thinking-about-it" and "story-building", and you may taste something you've never tasted before - or not. Now, THAT would be a story! But don't you dare tell it!!